Extending Alternating-Offers Bargaining in One-to-Many and Many-to-Many Settings
نویسندگان
چکیده
Automating negotiations in markets where multiple buyers and sellers operate is a scientific challenge of extraordinary importance. One-to-one negotiations are classically studied as bilateral bargaining problems, while one-to-many and many-to-many negotiations are studied as auctioning problems. This paper aims at bridging together these two approaches, analyzing agents’ strategic behavior in one-to-many and many-tomany negotiations when agents follow the alternating-offers bargaining protocol [22]. First, we extend this protocol, proposing a novel mechanism that captures the peculiarities of these settings. Then, we discuss agents’ equilibrium strategies with complete information and we preliminarily explore how uncertainty over reserve prices and deadlines can affect equilibrium strategies. Surprisingly, the computation of the equilibrium for realistic ranges of the parameters in one-to-many settings is reduced to the computation of the equilibrium either in one-to-one settings with uncertainty or in one-to-many settings without uncertainty.
منابع مشابه
Measuring the efficiency of Iranian electricity distribution companies, a combined approach to bargaining game with DEA
Many models have been proposed for measuring performance of business agencies up to now. The goal of this research is providing a new approach for evaluation and measurement of efficiencies of national power distribution companies. This approach is provided as a combination of Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) and Game Theory for evaluation of decision-making units by a large scale of actions. I...
متن کاملMeasuring the efficiency of Iranian electricity distribution companies, a combined approach to bargaining game with DEA
Many models have been proposed for measuring performance of business agencies up to now. The goal of this research is providing a new approach for evaluation and measurement of efficiencies of national power distribution companies. This approach is provided as a combination of Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) and Game Theory for evaluation of decision-making units by a large scale of actions. I...
متن کاملAlternating-Offers Bargaining Under One-Sided Uncertainty on Deadlines
Alternating-offers is the most prominent negotiation protocol for automatic bilateral bargaining. Nevertheless, in most settings it is still not known how two fully rational agents should behave in the protocol. In this paper we study the finite-horizon alternatingoffers protocol under one-sided uncertain deadlines. We make a novel use of backward induction in studying bargaining with uncertain...
متن کاملLeadership and Leadership Development in Healthcare Settings – A Simplistic Solution to Complex Problems?
There is a trend in health systems around the world to place great emphasis on and faith in improving ‘leadership’. Leadership has been defined in many ways and the elitist implications of traditional notions of leadership sit uncomfortably with modern healthcare organisations. The concept of distributed leadership incorporates inclusivity, collectiveness and collaboration, with the result that...
متن کاملDoes Scale of Public Hospitals Affect Bargaining Power? Evidence From Japan
Background Many of public hospitals in Japan have had a deficit for a long time. Japanese local governments have been encouraging public hospitals to use group purchasing of drugs to benefit from the economies of scale, and increase their bargaining power for obtaining discounts in drug purchasing, thus improving their financial situation. In this study, we empirically investigate whether or no...
متن کامل